kth: Remove irq_state from sem_.*irqsave's interface If disable_irqsave() and enable_irqsave() are in the same function, you don't need to have the state passed in. I stumbled on this while looking into whether or not CVs could drop the irqstate as well. The short version is 'no'. Our kernel CVs just use spinlocks. The particular lock and use case of the CVs is up to our caller, so whether or not that lock is used from IRQ context is beyond our control. It would be nice to be able to use the functionality of spin_lock_irqsave() to track whether or not we need to restore IRQs when we return. However, we unlock and relock that spinlock during the process of waiting and restarting. At that point, any information about whether or not we should reenable IRQs is gone. Thus we need to track it with irqstate. Note that the cv_wait code tracks whether or not IRQs were enabled *at the moment*, but we also need to know if IRQs were enabled at the point of the cv_lock_irqsave() and to carry that information over to cv_unlock_irqsave(). Also, none of the CV callers are from IRQ ctx anymore. At most, all are from RKMs. When analyzing CVs, we only care about the wakeup side too - you're not allowed to sleep from IRQ context. And no one even calls sem_.*irqsave(). I considered removing the CV irqsave functions (and sems), but given the flux in alarm code, there might come a time where we kick CVs from IRQ context again, to include immediate kernel messages. Signed-off-by: Barret Rhoden <brho@cs.berkeley.edu>
Akaros is an open source, GPL-licensed operating system for manycore architectures. Its goal is to provide better support for parallel and high-performance applications in the datacenter. Unlike traditional OSs, which limit access to certain resources (such as cores), Akaros provides native support for application-directed resource management and 100% isolation from other jobs running on the system.
Although not yet integrated as such, it is designed to operate as a low-level node OS with a higher-level Cluster OS, such as Mesos, governing how resources are shared amongst applications running on each node. Its system call API and “Many Core Process” abstraction better match the requirements of a Cluster OS, eliminating many of the obstacles faced by other systems when trying to isolate simultaneously running processes. Moreover, Akaros’s resource provisioning interfaces allow for node-local decisions to be made that enforce the resource allocations set up by a Cluster OS. This can be used to simplify global allocation decisions, reduce network communication, and ultimately promote more efficient sharing of resources. There is limited support for such functionality on existing operating systems.
Akaros is still very young, but preliminary results show that processes running on Akaros have an order of magnitude less noise than on Linux, as well as fewer periodic signals, resulting in better CPU isolation. Additionally, its non-traditional threading model has been shown to outperform the Linux NPTL across a number of representative application workloads. This includes a 3.4x faster thread context switch time, competitive performance for the NAS parallel benchmark suite, and a 6% increase in throughput over nginx for a simple thread-based webserver we wrote. We are actively working on expanding Akaros's capabilities even further.
Visit us at akaros.org
Instructions on installation and getting started with Akaros can be found in GETTING_STARTED.md
Our current documentation is very lacking, but it is slowly getting better over time. Most documentation is typically available in the Documentation/ directory. However, many of these documents are outdated, and some general cleanup is definitely in order.
Send an email to akaros+subscribe@googlegroups.com.
Or visit our google group and click “Join Group”
Create a new issue here.
brho hangs out (usually alone) in #akaros on irc.freenode.net. The other devs may pop in every now and then.
Instructions on contributing can be found in Documentation/Contributing.md.
The Akaros repository contains a mix of code from different projects across a few top-level directories. The kernel is in kern/, userspace libraries are in user/, and a variety of tools can be found in tools/, including the toolchain.
The Akaros kernel is licensed under the GNU General Public License, version 2. Our kernel is made up of code from a number of other systems. Anything written for the Akaros kernel is licensed “GPLv2 or later”. However, other code, such as from Linux and Plan 9, are licensed GPLv2, without the “or later” clause. There is also code from BSD, Xen, JOS, and Plan 9 derivatives. As a whole, the kernel is licensed GPLv2.
Note that the Plan 9 code that is a part of Akaros is also licensed under the Lucent Public License. The University of California, Berkeley, has been authorised by Alcatel-Lucent to release all Plan 9 software previously governed by the Lucent Public License, Version 1.02 under the GNU General Public License, Version 2. Akaros derives its Plan 9 code from this UCB release. For more information, see LICENSE-plan9 or here.
Our user code is likewise from a mix of sources. All code written for Akaros, such as user/parlib/, is licensed under the GNU LGPLv2.1, or later. Plan 9 libraries, including user/iplib and user/ndblib are licensed under the LGPLv2.1, but without the “or later”. See each library for details.
Likewise, tools/ is a collection of various code. All of our contributions to existing code bases, such as GCC, glibc, and busybox, are licensed under their respective projects' licenses.